Man Charged with Sexual Assault of Young Child

News

POSTED: Sunday, January 2, 2011 - 10:50am

UPDATED: Wednesday, January 5, 2011 - 10:03pm

Louis Roberto Casteneda has been charged with aggravated sexual assault of a child, indecency with a child by sexual contact and continuous sexual abuse of a young child.

He went before a judge on Friday where the charges against him were formally read. Police say the incidents occurred over the last two months, the most recent abuse, the day after Christmas. The child told her mother who then contacted police. Casteneda's bond was set at $225,000 dollars for the three charges.

Comments News Comments

how can you sit there and blame an innocent 6yr old girl? what kind of person are you to believe that someone that young would make that up.If you don't know all the facts, keep your mouth shut.

FOR YOUR INFORMATION I DO KNOW THE FACTS IF YOU SEE THE LIL GIRL YOU CAN TELL RIGHT AWAY NOTHING HAPPENED TO HER, SHE WOULD'VE CRIED OUT FOR HELP AT SCHOOL GROUNDS SUPPOSELY THIS HAPPEND DURING SCHOOL DAYS A MONDAY SHE HAD ALL WEEK TO COMPLAIN TO SOMEBODY DURING THAT TIME WHY WAIT 2 MONTHS IF HE DIDN'T EVEN LIVED UNDER THE SAME ROOF AS THEM, THEY SHOULD CHECK HER OLDER HALF BROTHER THAT LIVES WITH THEM, HE'S A DRUG ADDICT AND HE EVEN ASSAULTED THEIR MOM!!!!!!!!!!!! I KNOW THEM PERSONALLY.

Alot of the times, young girls tend to flirt with these older men to be "cool". Why did she take a long time (2 months) to tell her mom. I think that yes it is wrong what he did, because he should have acted as an adult, but the girl what about her? Is it okay just because she is a minor? Is that an excuse? What about the parents? Why didn't they know about this? Aren't they suppose to be looking over their minor?

All of the sudden he breaks up with her and boom she has dates of past months when they were together partying on December 25, 2010 come on it doesn't make sense!!!!!!!!!!!!

How can the police state that they had enough evidence if they are no evidence, he was under an investigation just because his ex-girlfriend daughter stated so, be fair, do a lie detector test on the child and the mom!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How can the police state something that is not true, without evidence he has only been detained because the little girl stated so,he was only investigated and after the investigator told him we have no evidence against you they did a swap for dna and the next day they called him to do in and he was detained, they really have to do a poligraph exam to that child and the mom to make sure!!!

Post new Comment